Comments for Steve Sanderson http://stevesanderson.com Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:56:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 Comment on Build a personal relationship manager on LinkedIn… maybe by jack nowicki http://stevesanderson.com/2009/01/22/build-a-personal-relationship-manager-on-linkedin-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-1232 jack nowicki Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:05:28 +0000 http://stevesanderson.com/2009/01/22/build-a-personal-relationship-manager-on-linkedin-maybe/#comment-1232 I kinda do this on blogger. They have a feature for "blogs I'm following" as well as I list all my friends on my opening page sidebar, which I glance at once in awhile to remind me to check them out.... that's how I noticed YOU today. Jack I kinda do this on blogger. They have a feature for “blogs I’m following” as well as I list all my friends on my opening page sidebar, which I glance at once in awhile to remind me to check them out….

that’s how I noticed YOU today. Jack

]]> Comment on Oh CouchDB, Why Do I Love Thee So…? by Web 2.0 Announcer http://stevesanderson.com/2008/12/21/oh-couchdb-why-do-i-love-thee-so/comment-page-1/#comment-1224 Web 2.0 Announcer Tue, 23 Dec 2008 20:17:34 +0000 http://stevesanderson.com/2008/12/21/oh-couchdb-why-do-i-love-thee-so/#comment-1224 <strong>Oh CouchDB, Why Do I Love Thee So...?...</strong> [...]Ok, so why are my friends and co-workers noticing my minor obsession about CouchDB? There’s a few reasons. First, I have a long-term unlove-affair with RDBMS. Why?[...]... Oh CouchDB, Why Do I Love Thee So…?…

[...]Ok, so why are my friends and co-workers noticing my minor obsession about CouchDB? There’s a few reasons. First, I have a long-term unlove-affair with RDBMS. Why?[...]…

]]> Comment on Oh CouchDB, Why Do I Love Thee So…? by People Over Process » Links for December 21st through December 22nd http://stevesanderson.com/2008/12/21/oh-couchdb-why-do-i-love-thee-so/comment-page-1/#comment-1223 People Over Process » Links for December 21st through December 22nd Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:57:13 +0000 http://stevesanderson.com/2008/12/21/oh-couchdb-why-do-i-love-thee-so/#comment-1223 [...] Steve Sanderson :: Oh CouchDB, Why Do I Love Thee So…? [...] [...] Steve Sanderson :: Oh CouchDB, Why Do I Love Thee So…? [...]

]]> Comment on FiveRuns by People Over Process » links for 2008-03-13 http://stevesanderson.com/2008/03/01/fiveruns/comment-page-1/#comment-1213 People Over Process » links for 2008-03-13 Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:19:30 +0000 http://stevesanderson.com/2008/03/01/fiveruns/#comment-1213 [...] Steve Sanderson :: FiveRuns The new VP of Development and Technology at RedMonk client FiveRuns. (tags: execs redmonkclients fiveruns) [...] [...] Steve Sanderson :: FiveRuns The new VP of Development and Technology at RedMonk client FiveRuns. (tags: execs redmonkclients fiveruns) [...]

]]> Comment on Specialists and generalists by Esteban Vargas http://stevesanderson.com/2004/12/09/specialists-and-generalists/comment-page-1/#comment-899 Esteban Vargas Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:44:28 +0000 http://stevesanderson.collectiveleap.com/?p=12#comment-899 Interesting proposition... I've grown closer to the idea of a generalist myself; however, you have taken the concept way WAY further than me :P For a while now I've "known" (if one can really do such thing) that the future in Technology lies not in being the all knowing all seeing God of X (where X is pick one...), but in being able to do well in A-Z. This was reinforced to me when I heard of an MD major that actually studies "everything" and graduates generalists as opposed to neurologists, podiatrists, etc. So I thought, why not a generalist for CS (but not someone with an undergraduate skill set but in fact someone with a graduate degree in the common technology language out there). If you think about it, CS has many parallelisms with MD, so if they can do it, why can’t we? But going from a generalist in one discipline (which itself is complex enough) to a multidisciplinary generalist is a bold (emphasize understatement here) step. Interesting proposition… I’ve grown closer to the idea of a generalist myself; however, you have taken the concept way WAY further than me :P

For a while now I’ve “known” (if one can really do such thing) that the future in Technology lies not in being the all knowing all seeing God of X (where X is pick one…), but in being able to do well in A-Z.

This was reinforced to me when I heard of an MD major that actually studies “everything” and graduates generalists as opposed to neurologists, podiatrists, etc. So I thought, why not a generalist for CS (but not someone with an undergraduate skill set but in fact someone with a graduate degree in the common technology language out there). If you think about it, CS has many parallelisms with MD, so if they can do it, why can’t we?

But going from a generalist in one discipline (which itself is complex enough) to a multidisciplinary generalist is a bold (emphasize understatement here) step.

]]> Comment on Down To The Desktop Or Up Into The Clouds by Aurelien http://stevesanderson.com/2007/08/01/down-or-up-into-the-clouds/comment-page-1/#comment-742 Aurelien Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:11:43 +0000 http://stevesanderson.com/2007/08/08/down-or-up-into-the-clouds/#comment-742 Hi! I'm one of the author of Contactizer Pro. What would really help us would be to explain why Contactizer did not make it. What exactly is the "right set of features"? Thanks for your comment Hi!

I’m one of the author of Contactizer Pro. What would really help us would be to explain why Contactizer did not make it.
What exactly is the “right set of features”?

Thanks for your comment

]]>